Aerosols from natural and anthropogenic sources exert significant yet highly variable influences on the Earth’s radiative balance characterized by pronounced spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Accurate quantification of these effects is crucial for enhancing climate projections and informing effective mitigation strategies. In this study, we evaluated the performance of three widely used aerosol optical depth (AOD) datasets—MERRA-2 (Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2), MODIS Aqua, and MODIS Terra—by comparing them against ground-based AERONET observations from ten stations located within the dust belt region. Statistical assessments included coefficient of determination (R2), correlation coefficient (R), Index of Agreement (IOA), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Relative Mean Bias (RMB), and standard deviation (SD). The results indicate that MERRA-2 showed the highest agreement (R = 0.76), followed by MODIS Aqua (R = 0.75) and MODIS Terra (R = 0.73). Seasonal and annual AOD climatology maps revealed comparable spatial patterns across datasets, although MODIS Terra consistently reported slightly higher AOD values. These findings provide a robust assessment and reanalysis of satellite AOD products over arid regions, offering critical guidance for aerosol modeling, data assimilation, and climate impact studies.
Samman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: