Regression analysis assesses the impact of neighborhood deprivation index on cognitive abilities, suggesting demographic variables influence outcomes.
Objective Social determinants of Health (SDoH) play a major role in neuropsychological status. One comprehensive SDoH variable that has shown to predict neuropsychological status is area deprivation index (ADI). Specifically, this is a composite score that reflects the degree of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (Kind et al., 2018). Prior studies show higher ADI scores indicate worse neuropsychological status (Aneshensel, 2014; Evans, 2003; Shonkoff et al., 2012). We hypothesize that ADI scores will negatively predict neuropsychological performance when demographic clinical diagnoses variables are controlled. Method This clinical sample has 103 adults (M Age= 47.13) who completed a neuropsychological examination between September 2016 and December 2019 at an outpatient clinic. ADI score (17 SES indicators) was calculated based on address at time of exam and transformed into a quintile score. Raw test scores were converted to z-scores and used to create cognitive domain index scores and a global cognitive function score. Regression analysis was conducted to test the hypothesized interaction. Results A linear regression was conducted to assess if ADI significantly predicted global cognitive function above age, gender, race, ethnicity, and education. The demographic model was significant (R2 = .182, p= .001). The addition of ADI slightly increased explained variance (ΔR2 = .020), but it was not statistically significant (p= .122). Conclusion Though not strong enough for statistical significance in this sample, ADI does show a trend with global cognitive functioning in the expected direction. Future studies should repeat this analysis with a larger sample size to determine if the trend was not significant due to inadequate power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brettler et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: