Electrochemical analysis shows that specific ligands improve SnFe–N–C performance, suggesting new pathways for catalyst design.
Iron–nitrogen–carbon materials are still the most promising alternative to platinum group materials for the electrochemical reduction of O 2 . Doping with a secondary metal center is a possible way to further enhance the activity, and Sn seems to be a valuable choice. Here, SnFe–N–C materials featuring both Fe and Sn single‐site atoms were prepared from Sn precursors to study the effect on physical‐chemical and electrochemical properties. Sn could act as a structural promoter for iron, regulate charge distribution, and favor the formation of more chemically stable sites. Here, we show that oxygen‐containing ligands favor the fixation of Sn and Sn/Fe alloy, while others do not. Interestingly, the presence of nitrogen is not fundamental in the Sn precursor. Indeed, SnCl 2 is a valuable precursor. At the same time, (NH 4 ) 2 SnCl 6 is a valid and cheaper alternative to Sn(phen)Cl 2 to fix a higher amount of Fe‐N x single‐site. Even if the amount of Sn remains low in all samples (as a single site), all the bimetallic catalysts outperform the sole iron one (the best catalysts show a 3‐fold increment). In addition, in situ electrochemical XAS confirms the redox behavior of Fe, while Sn does not show any oxidation or coordination changes under operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazzucato et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: