This case study examines urban livestock keeping's role in food security among households in Arusha, suggesting benefits for community resilience.
This article examines the contribution of urban livestock keeping to food security in Arusha city, taking the case study of Daraja Mbili, Sombetini and Sokoni One; random sampling was applied in the selection of the wards. The main focus was identifying the main urban livestock kept in the study area, to examine the contribution made by the different farming categories, and to investigate the relationship between livestock keeping and food security in the areas selected. The sample selected was 200 households of different ages and genders, and snowballs and judgemental were applied. Data was then collected using questionnaire, interviews, observation and focused group discussions. The information was processed and filtered for analyses. Analyses tools used were SPSS and Microsoft excel. Different types of livestock kept at the study area were identified, examined and analysed. It was observed that there is a positive relationship between urban livestock keeping and food security. In other words, urban livestock keepers had potential benefits in keeping dairy cows, goats, sheep, doves and ducks. The result stipulated the contribution of each variable examined. Dairy cows had much contribution than others, milk production surpassed by average of 1-15 litres per day. Large amount of milk produced is 11-20 litres with 40.4 %, followed by 1-10 litres with 24.8 %. Milk was sold and other portion used by family members. The price of one litre of milk was sold by 1600/=Tsh, therefore a farmer was able to collect more than 100,000/=Tsh per day, which has significance in food security attainment. The contribution of other livestock like goats, sheep and poultry like chickens and ducks is highly considered to supplement life cost. Several challenges of production were encounted, though many opportunities if properly utilised may reduce or remove some of the food insecurity issues. The government is therefore consulted to support small livestock keepers in terms of the market of their produce and medical treatment when some diseases attack but also supervising the hygiene of the product since some of the farmers are not well equipped with skills of keeping animals, i.e. they use their traditional styles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayat R. Abdallah (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: