PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science3 citations

Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of modular construction: a US case study of a prototype housing unit

View Full Paper
TNTran Duong NguyenPPPardis Pishdad

Key Points

  • Modular construction can achieve 54% lower embodied carbon per square foot compared to traditional construction, highlighting its environmental efficiency.
  • The study utilized life cycle assessment to systematically evaluate the environmental performance of modular versus traditional construction in the US.
  • Efficient material use and minimized on-site waste in modular construction substantially reduce emissions per kilogram of material used.
  • Findings emphasize the potential of modular construction for sustainable housing solutions, especially in affordable and post-disaster contexts.

Abstract

The construction industry is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion, and waste generation. Modular construction (MC), which involves prefabricating building components off-site and assembling them on-site, has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce project time, cost, and environmental impacts. However, there is still limited comparative life cycle data available when measuring against traditional construction (TC). This study evaluates the environmental performance of MC versus TC in the United States through life cycle assessment (LCA). A mixed-methods approach combines a literature review with a comparative case study analyzed through BIM-integrated LCA tools. Results indicate that MC can achieve up to 54% lower embodied carbon per square foot and 45% lower emissions per kilogram of material, mainly due to efficient material use, prefabrication, and minimized on-site waste. Controlled factory-based production also enhances optimization and reduces environmental burdens during the construction process. These benefits, alongside faster project delivery, position MC as a viable pathway toward sustainable construction, particularly for affordable housing and post-disaster recovery. Key limitations include data variability and the restricted scope of current LCA datasets, highlighting the need for broader, multi-regional studies and diverse building typologies to strengthen future assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nguyen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d9052141e1c178a14f500bhttps://doi.org/10.1680/jenes.24.00146
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Challenges in life cycle assessment implementation for construction environmental product declaration development: A mixed approach and global perspective2024 · 63 citations
  2. 2Application of Monte Carlo Analysis to Life Cycle Assessment1999 · 32 citations
  3. 3Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA2008 · 1,340 citations
  4. 4Digitalization to achieve sustainable development goals: Steps towards a Smart Green Planet2021 · 914 citations
  5. 5Overcoming the Barriers Toward Widespread Adoption of Prefabrication: An Approach Involving Emerging Technologies2023 · 4 citations