PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Health Science Reports2 citationsOpen Access

Predicting the Determinants of Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors Using Protection Motivation Theory: A Cross‐Sectional Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Analysis

View Full Paper
MGMahdi Gholian‐AvalBBBahareh BehrouziJJJamshid Jamali

Key Points

  • Participants showed a moderate screening intention score of 54.8 out of 100, contrasting with a low actual screening behavior score of 26.1.
  • The study highlighted that perceived severity and response efficacy positively affected behavioral intention, while perceived rewards had a negative impact.
  • Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), the research examined cognitive factors among 433 adults over 50 years in Iran.
  • The gap between intention and actual screening behavior suggests the need for additional contextual strategies to enhance participation rates.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces mortality by 40%–60%, yet participation remains low globally. In this study, we applied protection motivation theory (PMT) to identify determinants of CRC screening behavior in Iran using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM). Design and Methods This cross‐sectional study was conducted on 433 adults over 50 years of age using stratified sampling in Neyshabur, Iran in 2024. Participants completed a validated 43‐item PMT questionnaire assessing key cognitive factors (perceived sensitivity, severity, self‐efficacy, response efficacy, response costs, fear, rewards, and behavioral intention), with self‐reported screening behavior as the outcome. Results Among the PMT constructs, self‐efficacy had the highest mean score (69.43 ± 18.97 out of 100), while actual screening behavior had the lowest (26.12 ± 9.93 out of 100). PLS‐SEM analysis revealed significant pathways: perceived severity ( β = 0.118, p = 0.030) and response efficacy ( β = 0.172, p = 0.003) positively influenced behavioral intention, while perceived rewards negatively impacted intention ( β = −0.197, p < 0.001). Fear mediated sensitivity/severity effects on intention ( β = 0.155, p = 0.003). Notably, self‐efficacy and response costs showed nonsignificant relationships with intention. Conclusion Participants demonstrated moderate intention (54.8 of 100) yet low screening behavior (26.1 of 100), highlighting a critical intention–behavior gap. While PMT constructs effectively predicted screening intention, their limited ability to explain behavior underscores the influence of contextual barriers beyond cognitive appraisals in this Iranian cohort. Future interventions should integrate PMT‐based education targeting threat appraisal with system‐level strategies (e.g., mailed test kits, navigational support) to bridge this implementation gap.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gholian‐Aval et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d9052141e1c178a14f5026https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71295
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper