Repairing the central nervous system (CNS) remains one of the most difficult obstacles to overcome in translational neurosciences. This is due to intrinsic growth inhibitors, extracellular matrix issues, the glial scar–form barrier, chronic neuroinflammation, and epigenetic silencing. The purpose of this review is to bring together findings from recent developments in genome editing and computational approaches, which center around the possible convergence of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) platforms and artificial intelligence (AI), towards precision neuroregeneration. We wished to outline possible ways in which CRISPR-based systems, including but not limited to Cas9 and Cas12 nucleases, RNA-targeting Cas13, base and prime editors, and transcriptional regulators such as CRISPRa/i, can be applied to potentially reactivate axon-growth programs, alter inhibitory extracellular signaling, reprogram or lineage transform glia to functional neurons, and block oncogenic pathways in glioblastoma. In addition, we wanted to highlight how AI approaches, such as single-cell multi-omics, radiogenomic prediction, development of digital twins, and design of adaptive clinical trials, will increasingly be positioned to act as system-level architects that allow translation of complex datasets into predictive and actionable therapeutic approaches. We examine convergence consumers in spinal cord injury and adaptive neuro-oncology and discuss expanse consumers in ischemic stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and rare neurogenetic syndromes. Finally, we discuss the ethical and regulatory landscape around beyond off-target editing and genomic stability of CRISPR, algorithmic bias, explainability, and equitable access to advanced neurotherapies. Our intent was not to provide a comprehensive inventory of possibilities but rather to provide a conceptual tool where CRISPR acts as a molecular manipulator and AI as a computational integrator, converging to create pathways towards precision neuroregeneration, personalized medicine, and adaptive neurotherapeutics that are ethically sound.
Șerban et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: