This study reveals differences in antibody response to variant surface glycoproteins in human african trypanosomiasis, indicating potential diagnostic targets.
Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) is a severe disease endemic to Sub-Saharan Africa caused by the parasite Trypanosoma brucei. Trypanosoma brucei parasites rely on the antigenic variation of their variant surface glycoproteins (VSG) to evade host antibody recognition, and diagnosis of the chronic form of HAT relies heavily on serological screening tests that detect specific antibodies. Despite the biological and clinical significance of anti-VSG antibodies, studies of the antibody response to VSG have been limited by low-throughput approaches that allow for the analysis of only a few VSG proteins at a time, primarily in animal models, leading to a fragmented understanding of how antibody targets VSG in HAT. Here, we use phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-seq) to comprehensively characterize the antibody response to VSG in HAT patient serum. Using a T7 bacteriophage display library containing peptides representing 12,108 unique T. brucei VSGs, our analysis revealed significant differences in the anti-VSG antibody response between the acute and chronic forms of HAT. Our results show that, in chronic HAT, the top lobe of the VSG is the primary interface of antibody interactions. By characterizing the targets of anti-VSG immunity, we also identified a potential bias in the CATT, the most common serological test used for HAT screening. Finally, we were able to identify sets of seroprevalent VSG peptides for each form of the disease that successfully distinguish between infected and uninfected individuals. Our results demonstrate the utility of characterizing host antibody responses against African trypanosomes, which can reveal unique features of parasite biology while also uncovering new diagnostic targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: