PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Frontiers in Surgery3 citationsOpen Access

Pushing the boundaries in autologous breast reconstruction: innovations from imaging to artificial intelligence

View Full Paper
ISIsabell ScherrerILIngo LudolphDPDominik Promny

Key Points

  • Autologous tissue transfer, especially using DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps, enhances patient satisfaction.
  • Surgical interventions for breast cancer are vital for physical restoration and psychosocial rehabilitation.
  • Innovations in breast reconstruction focus on individualizing options to improve outcomes for patients.
  • The increasing incidence of breast cancer demands safer and functionally superior reconstructive solutions.

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide, with surgical intervention, ranging from breast-conserving procedures to total mastectomy, representing a cornerstone of curative treatment. In this context, breast reconstruction has become an essential component of comprehensive cancer treatment, addressing not only physical restoration but also playing a vital role in psychosocial rehabilitation and body image. Among the various reconstructive options, autologous tissue transfer has emerged as the preferred method for many patients, offering durable and natural-feeling results. In particular, abdominal-based free flaps such as the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap and the muscle-sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (ms-TRAM) flap offer excellent results with reduced donor side morbidity. As the global number of breast cancer continues to rise, the demand for safe, individualized, and functionally superior reconstructive options rises as well. This article aims to provide a general overview of current surgical approaches and to highlight perspectives for future innovations in improving autologous breast reconstruction and patient satisfaction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scherrer et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d9052541e1c178a14f5564https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1679524
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Suture Packaging as a Marker for Intraoperative Image Alignment in Augmented Reality on Mobile Devices2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Tissue perfusion in DIEP flaps using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography, Hyperspectral imaging, and Thermal imaging2024 · 12 citations
  3. 3Application of Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Enhance Safety and Individualize Distraction of Severely Contracted Joints in Far-Advanced Dupuytren’s Disease2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Postoperatives Monitoring freier Muskellappenplastiken mittels perforatorbasierten adipokutanen Monitorinseln: Ökonomie, Versorgungsqualität und Ästhetik2022 · 3 citations
  5. 5The LYMPH trial: comparing microsurgical with conservative treatment for chronic breast cancer-associated lymphoedema – study protocol of a pragmatic randomised international multicentre superiority trial2025 · 8 citations