PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Sustainability8 citationsOpen Access

Life Cycle Assessment Sheds New Insights Toward Sustainable Management of Biodegradable Resin Blends Used in Packaging: A Case Study on PBAT

View Full Paper
NANiloofar Akbarian-SaraviRLRazieh LarizadehAGArvind Gupta

Key Points

  • Composting PBAT blends can offset production emissions significantly compared to landfilling polyethylene.
  • Producing 1 kg of PBAT blend generates 921 mPt in impact, with GWP of 8.64 kg CO2-eq, mainly from mixing and drying.
  • Assessing end-of-life strategies, composting PBAT yields −53.9 mPt and 11.35 kg CO2-eq savings over landfilling conventional plastic.
  • Energy efficiency improvements could reduce impacts by up to 10%, highlighting the need for sustainable development in bioplastics.

Abstract

Bioplastics are gaining attention as eco-friendly alternatives to conventional plastics, with Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate (PBAT) emerging as a promising biodegradable substitute for polyethylene (PE) in food packaging. Commercial PBAT is often blended with other plastics or bio-based fillers to improve mechanical properties and reduce costs, though these additives can influence its environmental footprint. Therefore, this study quantifies the environmental impacts of producing PBAT resin blends reinforced with common inorganic fillers and compares end-of-life (EoL) performance against PE. While prior studies have largely assessed virgin PBAT or PBAT/Polylactic Acid (PLA) systems, systematic LCA of commercial-style PBAT blends with inorganic fillers and screening LCA level for comparisons of composting vs. landfill remain limited. The contributions of this study are to: (i) map gate-to-gate environmental hotspots for PBAT-blend conversion, (ii) provide a screening gate-to-grave comparison of PBAT composting vs. PE landfill using ReCiPe 2016 and IPCC GWP100 methods, and (iii) discuss theoretical implications for material substitution in the context of EoL strategies. The results indicated that producing 1 kg of PBAT blend generated a single score impact of 921 mPt with Human Health and Resource categories contributing similarly, and a GWP of 8.64 kg CO2-eq, dominated by mixing and drying processes. EoL screening showed PBAT composting offered clear advantages over landfilling PE, yielding −53.9 mPt and 11.35 kg CO2-eq savings, effectively offsetting production emissions. In contrast, landfilling PE resulted in 288.8 mPt and 2.2 kg CO2-eq emissions. Sensitivity analysis further demonstrated that a 30% reduction in electricity use could decrease impacts by up to 10%, underscoring the importance of energy efficiency improvements and renewable energy adoption for sustainable PBAT development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Akbarian-Saravi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d9052941e1c178a14f57fdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su17198645
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Environmental Impact of Solar and Wind energy- A Review2021 · 108 citations
  2. 2Bio-based plastics, biodegradable plastics, and compostable plastics: biodegradation mechanism, biodegradability standards and environmental stratagem2024 · 157 citations
  3. 3Techno-economic analysis and multi-criteria assessment of a hemp-based biocomposite production supply chain: a case study2025 · 3 citations
  4. 4Implementation of modern films in the process of mass packaging of bottles based on the circular economy2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Degradation of conventional plastic wastes in the environment: A review on current status of knowledge and future perspectives of disposal2021 · 633 citations