PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Urban Studies12 citationsOpen Access

The regeneration path not taken further: An experiment in urban densification and state entrepreneurialism in a resettlement neighborhood in Suzhou, China

View Full Paper
PPPaola PellegriniJCJinliu Chen

Key Points

  • Urban densification improved living standards and urban space but failed to achieve sufficient financial profitability.
  • Local government strategically employed densification to maintain social stability without causing displacement or gentrification.
  • Densification was hindered by a misalignment between political goals and economic realities in a neoliberal landscape.
  • The research suggests that effective feasibility assessments and adaptive planning are crucial for the success of urban regeneration projects.

Abstract

Urban densification and its implications remain underexplored in China, especially regarding the regeneration of urban decaying areas. This study contributes to the discourse by investigating densification as a strategic urban regeneration tool in China’s state–market development, focusing on one of the most common forms of residential areas in post-reform urbanization, the resettlement neighborhood. Integrating fieldwork, archival research, interviews, and media analysis, the study examines a pioneering densification in the transition of state-entrepreneurialism to a free market. Unlike Western cases, prompted by private interests, the local government leveraged densification to reconcile social stability with economic imperatives. Notably, the project avoided displacement and gentrification by funding works through commercial space development. However, while the regeneration project achieved improved living standards and urban space enhancement, findings reveal that the financial profitability due to densification was undermined by inadequate alignment between political objectives and economic realities. Despite the initial intentions, the densification process was not replicated due to its failure to generate sufficient profit. The study underscores the challenges of implementing densification within a neoliberal–authoritarian framework, where state control, market liberalization, and social equity can be conflicting. It also emphasizes the role of densification in shifting from land-based urbanization to urban regeneration within profit-maximizing state entrepreneurialism. The study also highlights the need for feasibility assessments and adaptive planning in the transition. Additionally, the study reflects on the broader implications for the transformation of typical resettlement neighborhoods across China, which face decay and rising living standards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pellegrini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d90a0141e1c178a14f5f14https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251365188
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Contesting Entrepreneurialism of Community Governance within (In)Formal Urban Regeneration: A Case of the Eshan Market, Shanghai, China2026
  2. 2Redeveloping ageing communities under state entrepreneurialism in China: The case of Xiaoxihu, Nanjing2025
  3. 3Sustainability outcomes and policy implications: Evaluating China’s “old urban neighborhood renewal” experiment2024 · 13 citations
  4. 4Framing Participatory Regeneration in Communal Space Governance: A Case Study of Work-Unit Compound Neighborhoods in Shanghai, China2025
  5. 5Why urban densification ignores the social dimension of sustainability2025