This analysis reveals distinctions in offender and victim attributes for expressive and instrumental homicides, highlighting implications for profiling.
This study investigated criminal patterns within the expressive‐instrumental homicide typology by analysing homicide cases from 2013 to 2022. We coded and analysed a sample of 254 solved homicides from China Judgements Online through chi‐square tests, binary logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. First, we examined whether expressive and instrumental homicides demonstrated significant distinctions in offender and victim characteristics, and behavioural patterns. Second, we explored the associations between these behavioural indicators and the expressive‐instrumental typology. Our results demonstrated that overkill, offenders' use of threat and control, victim targeting, and dealing of forensic evidence significantly differentiated expressive and instrumental homicides, and effectively predicted motivational typologies in homicides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruihan Chen (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: