PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 20250 citationsOpen Access

MapQA: Open-domain Geospatial Question Answering on Map Data

View Full Paper
ZLZekun LiMGMurray GrossmanEEric

Key Points

  • MapQA provides over 3,154 geospatial question-answer pairs that require complex reasoning.
  • The dataset includes geometries of geo-entities, expanding the diversity of question types.
  • Methods include retrieval-based language models for embedding similarity and large language models for SQL generation.
  • LLMs excel at one-hop reasoning but struggle with multi-hop tasks, indicating a need for advancement in systems.

Abstract

Geospatial question answering (QA) is a fundamental task in navigation and point of interest (POI) searches. While existing geospatial QA datasets exist, they are limited in both scale and diversity, often relying solely on textual descriptions of geo-entities without considering their geometries. A major challenge in scaling geospatial QA datasets for reasoning lies in the complexity of geospatial relationships, which require integrating spatial structures, topological dependencies, and multi-hop reasoning capabilities that most text-based QA datasets lack. To address these limitations, we introduce MapQA, a novel dataset that not only provides question-answer pairs but also includes the geometries of geo-entities referenced in the questions. MapQA is constructed using SQL query templates to extract question-answer pairs from OpenStreetMap (OSM) for two study regions: Southern California and Illinois. It consists of 3,154 QA pairs spanning nine question types that require geospatial reasoning, such as neighborhood inference and geo-entity type identification. Compared to existing datasets, MapQA expands both the number and diversity of geospatial question types. We explore two approaches to tackle this challenge: (1) a retrieval-based language model that ranks candidate geo-entities by embedding similarity, and (2) a large language model (LLM) that generates SQL queries from natural language questions and geo-entity attributes, which are then executed against an OSM database. Our findings indicate that retrieval-based methods effectively capture concepts like closeness and direction but struggle with questions that require explicit computations (e.g., distance calculations). LLMs (e.g., GPT and Gemini) excel at generating SQL queries for one-hop reasoning but face challenges with multi-hop reasoning, highlighting a key bottleneck in advancing geospatial QA systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d90a0f41e1c178a14f6aa2https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.07871
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Geo-analytical question-answering with GIS2020 · 68 citations
  2. 2Developing an Entity Linking Model for Geographic Knowledge Base Question Answering2024
  3. 3Introducing the VISQAM Dataset: Toward Automated Map Interpretation2026
  4. 4MapIQ: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models for Map Question Answering2025
  5. 5An Automated Framework for Natural Language-Based Spatial Query Using Large Language Models2026 · 2 citations