PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering2 citations

Transformer Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Pseudo‐Image Processing and Improved Random Forest

View Full Paper
LWLingyun WangRLRan LiHXHonglei Xu

Key Points

  • The proposed method enhances fault feature extraction, leading to higher diagnostic rates in transformer models.
  • Using improved random forest, the method fine-tunes feature selection based on gas analysis data.
  • Transforming gas sequences into three-channel maps through gramian angular field facilitates better analysis.
  • This approach notably improves diagnostic accuracy, with metrics showing increased performance across multiple models.

Abstract

The power system operation is becoming challenging due to growing power demand. The detection and classification of transformer faults, as the core equipment in the power system, are crucial for the stable operation of the grid. However, there is no uniform standard for transformer fault feature selection based on dissolved gas analysis (DGA). This paper proposes a transformer fault diagnosis method based on parameter migration feature extraction and improved random forest (IRF) feature selection. Firstly, the gramian angular field (GAF) is introduced to transform the one‐dimensional gas sequence into a three‐channel map, and the sample data are balanced using image processing methods. Next, the parameters of the pre‐trained VGG16 feature extraction layer are utilized to establish a model that can extract GAF image features automatically. Then, to obtain optimal features, the IRF algorithm is improved by comprehensively considering the Pearson correlation coefficient. The results indicate that the proposed method is more effective in extracting fault features than the conventional approach. After filtering out the optimal features with IRF, the diagnostic rate of the LR, SVM, MLP, and SGD transformer fault model is improved by 4. 27%, 12. 2%, 6. 7%, 10. 97%, and F1ₛcore is enhanced by 4. 53%, 12. 55%, 6. 43%, and 10. 92%, respectively. © 2025 Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan and Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d90bc641e1c178a14f6e69https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.70164
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transformer Core Fault Diagnosis via Current Signal Analysis with Pearson Correlation Feature Selection2024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Multi-point grounding fault diagnosis and temperature field coupling analysis of oil-immersed transformer core based on finite element simulation2024 · 31 citations
  3. 3Study of "code absence" in the IEC three-ratio method of dissolved gas analysis2015 · 46 citations
  4. 4Open-circuit fault diagnosis method of inverter in wind turbine yaw system based on GADF image coding2024 · 14 citations
  5. 5Identification of plant leaf diseases using a nine-layer deep convolutional neural network2019 · 864 citations