Cohort study shows ASCVD risk is higher with carotid bifurcation and common femoral plaques, indicating significant implications for patient monitoring.
Background: The aims were to determine the 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in individuals free from ASCVD (a) in the presence of carotid bifurcation plaques (CBP) < 3-mm thick and ⩾ 3 mm in comparison to a normal vessel wall and (b) the risk modulation in the presence or absence of additional common femoral bifurcations with plaques (CFBP) in a cohort study. Methods A total of 1000 subjects aged 58.4 ± 10.5 years, free from ASCVD, were followed up for 15.2 ± 4.9 years (mean ± SD). The primary endpoint was a composite of first time fatal or nonfatal 10-year ASCVD events. Results The 10-year risk of ASCVD was 6% in the absence of carotid plaques; 10% in the presence of unilateral and 23% in the presence of bilateral < 3-mm plaques (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.65 [95% CI 1.11–2.47] and 2.03 [95% CI 1.32–3.00], respectively); and 29% for unilateral and 63% for bilateral 3–5 mm plaques (adjusted HR 2.40 [95% CI 1.41–4.09] and 3.78 [95% CI 1.77–8.06], respectively). In those with unilateral or bilateral < 3-mm CBP in the presence of two CFBP, the 10-year risk of ASCVD was 26% and 37% (adjusted HR 3.01 [95% CI 1.38–6.58] and 2.52 [95% CI 1.55–4.10], respectively). The 10-year risk was 2% in those without CBP or CFBP and 26% in those with two CFBP only. Conclusions The presence of a < 3-mm CBP may be associated with a significant ASCVD risk, especially if bilateral. This risk is better defined by the additional presence or absence of two CFBPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolaides et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: