This analysis maps borderland identities in social psychology, highlighting themes of categorization and identity development.
Borderland identities transcend conventional conceptualizations of their identity category and challenge prevalent social theories underlying a given identity domain. The experiences of people with borderland identities differ from the experiences of people with conventional dominant or marginalized identities. Since Anzaldúa advanced her original 1980s theory of borderland identities focusing on the Chicano experience in the U.S., humanities and social sciences scholars have applied borderland theory to understanding experiences of gender, race, and sexuality. However, to date, no review has been conducted to integrate findings across the field of social psychology and highlight potential areas of growth. This paper aims to do so by mapping the literature on four borderland identities: asexual, bisexual, gender non-binary, and Multiracial. We discuss previous findings around three common themes: categorization, discrimination, and identity development. Common findings, remaining questions, and future directions are highlighted. Finally, we consider both theoretical and practical implications of a borderland identity perspective for the field of social psychology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lingl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: