PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 20250 citationsOpen Access

EvolMathEval: Towards Evolvable Benchmarks for Mathematical Reasoning via Evolutionary Testing

View Full Paper
SWShengbo WangMLMingwei LiuZLZhonghai Li

Key Points

  • The EvolMathEval framework generates evolving benchmarks that reduce data contamination risks, ensuring ongoing challenge for models.
  • Experimental results show that the composite fitness function accurately quantifies problem difficulty, enhancing evaluation accuracy.
  • Using evolutionary testing, EvolMathEval improves public datasets, significantly lowering model accuracy by an average of 48%.
  • Findings reveal that LLMs often rely on non-rigorous heuristics, termed 'Pseudo Aha Moment', accounting for 77% to 100% of errors on complex tasks.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of LLMs poses a significant challenge to existing mathematical reasoning benchmarks. These benchmarks commonly suffer from issues such as score saturation, temporal decay, and data contamination. To address this challenge, this paper introduces EvolMathEval, an automated mathematical benchmark generation and evolution framework based on evolutionary testing. By dynamically generating unique evaluation instances ab initio, the framework fundamentally eliminates the risk of data contamination, and ensuring the benchmark remains perpetually challenging for future models.The core mechanisms of EvolMathEval include: seed problem generation based on reverse engineering with algebraic guarantees; multi-dimensional genetic operators designed to inject diverse cognitive challenges; and a composite fitness function that can rapidly and accurately assess problem difficulty. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed composite fitness function can efficiently and precisely quantify the difficulty of mathematical problems. Furthermore, EvolMathEval can not only generate a large volume of high-difficulty problems through continuous self-iteration, but it can also significantly enhance the complexity of public datasets like GSM8K through evolution, reducing model accuracy by an average of 48%. Deeper investigation reveals that when solving these evolved, complex problems, LLMs tend to employ non-rigorous heuristics to bypass complex multi-step logical reasoning, consequently leading to incorrect solutions. We define this phenomenon as "Pseudo Aha Moment". This finding uncovers a cognitive shortcut-taking behavior in the deep reasoning processes of current LLMs, which we find accounts for 77% to 100% of errors on targeted problems. Code and resources are available at:https://github.com/SYSUSELab/EvolMathEval.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d913b24ddcf71ba560bfd1https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.13003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper