PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces7 citations

Strategies and Prospects for the Design of Inorganic Ceramic Electrolyte for High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries

View Full Paper
KRKang‐Rui RenZCZ. ChenBJB. B. Jia

Key Points

  • Enhancing energy density in lithium-ion batteries requires robust solid-state electrolytes to address performance challenges.
  • High ionic conductivity and chemical stability are critical in selecting sulfide and oxide solid-state electrolytes for batteries.
  • Strategies such as artificial SEI layers and electrode modifications aim to improve interfacial compatibility between solid-state electrolytes and battery electrodes.
  • Interfacial challenges remain a significant barrier in fully utilizing the advantages of solid-state electrolytes in lithium-ion batteries.

Abstract

In order to enhance the energy density of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), the development of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) has become imperative. In particular, inorganic SSEs are gaining attention due to their inherent merits, including nonflammability and a wide operating temperature range. Among these, sulfide- and oxide-based SSEs stand out owing to their high ionic conductivity and excellent chemical stability, respectively. However, despite these advantages, achieving good interfacial compatibility between SSEs and the cathode and anode in full cells to address issues such as interfacial side reactions and high interfacial impedance remains a major challenge in the development of high-performance solid-state electrolytes. This review first examines the structural and chemical similarities and differences between oxide and sulfide SSEs, and it elucidates the mechanisms of interfacial side reactions. It then discusses recent advances in three strategies aimed at addressing these interfacial issues: element doping, artificial SEI layers, and electrode material modifications. Lastly, the review provides a comprehensive overview of interfacial challenges specific to sulfide and oxide SSEs and offers perspectives on the future development of solid-state electrolytes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ren et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d913b74ddcf71ba560c2afhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5c09137
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In Situ Polymerization Inhibiting Electron Localization in Hybrid Electrolyte for Room‐Temperature Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries2024 · 72 citations
  2. 2Wet‐Processable Binder in Composite Cathode for High Energy Density All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries2024 · 33 citations
  3. 3Superionic lithium transport via multiple coordination environments defined by two-anion packing2024 · 74 citations
  4. 4Interphase Engineering Enabled All-Ceramic Lithium Battery2018 · 474 citations
  5. 5Solid electrolyte interphases in lithium metal batteries2023 · 573 citations