Retrospective analysis shows comparable survival rates in upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable liver metastases, highlighting the risk of early relapse.
Background/Aim: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in treating initially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) remains controversial. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively compared outcomes between patients who underwent upfront surgery and those who received NAC followed by curative CRCLM surgery. Factors associated with early relapse were also investigated. Fifty-three patients were included (upfront surgery: n=31, NAC: n=22). Results: The 3-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were comparable between the upfront surgery and NAC groups [OS: 83.9% vs. 81.8%, p=0.9, hazard ratio (HR)=1.07; RFS: 58.1% vs. 36.4%, p=0.1, HR=1.87]. However, among metachronous CRCLM cohorts, the 3-year OS rates were 88.2% and 90.0% (p=0.9, HR=0.85), and the 3-year RFS rates were 76.4% and 30.0% (p=0.015, HR=4.03), respectively. Patients with higher computed tomography values in CRCLM had significantly better RFS than those with lower values (p=0.04). Conversely, a higher number of CRCLM after NAC was significantly correlated with shorter RFS (p=0.007). Conclusion: Routine NAC for initially resectable metachronous CRCLM should be avoided because of the high risk of early relapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: