PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)0 citationsOpen Access

Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks Models

View Full Paper
IÜIşıl ÜnaldıLTLeman Tomak

Key Points

  • InceptionResNetV2+SVM achieved 99.3% accuracy, showing superior performance for BreakHis dataset.
  • Models including VGG16 and Xception were compared, demonstrating varying success in breast tumor classification.
  • Utilizing transfer learning, models were fine-tuned to enhance diagnostic capabilities on histopathological images.
  • Performance metrics such as precision, recall, and AUC demonstrated the models' strong generalization abilities.

Abstract

Early diagnosis and treatment can reduce mortality rates by preventing the progression of breast cancer. Owing to convolutional neural networks (CNN), breast cancer diagnosis can be performed faster and more objectively than humans using thousands of histopathological images. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the rapid and effective diagnostic performance of CNN models on breast tumor images, utilizing transfer learning through pre-training and fine-tuning on novel datasets. The study was performed in two ways on BreakHis and BACH datasets. First, fine-tuned VGG16, VGG19, Xception, InceptionV3, ResNet50, and InceptionResNetV2 models were used for classification. Second, these CNN models were used as feature extractors and support vector machines (SVMs) as classifiers. The success of all models in tumor classification was interpreted using performance metrics, such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC. The models showing the best performance as a result of the analyses were as follows: InceptionResNetV2+SVM model with an accuracy of 99.3%, precision of 99.0%, recall of 100.0%, F1 score of 99.5%, AUC of 98.9% for BreakHis dataset; and InceptionResNetV2 model with accuracy of 96.7%, precision of 93.8%, recall of 100.0%, F1 score of 96.8%, AUC of 96.7% for the BACH dataset. As a conclusion, it has been seen that the CNN methods have good generalization abilities and can respond to clinical needs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ünaldı et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc12c58a7d58c25ebb0952https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v9i5.6420
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Performance analysis of breast cancer histopathology image classification using transfer learning models2024 · 13 citations
  2. 2A SQUEEZE-EXCITE INTEGRATED NOVEL CNN MODEL FOR BREAST CANCER HISTOPATHOLOGICAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION2025
  3. 3Convolutional neural network classification of cancer cytopathology images: taking breast cancer as an example2024 · 109 citations
  4. 4Breast Cancer Identification using Convolutional Neural Network2018
  5. 5Multi-Input CNN Models for Breast Cancer Detection Using BreakHis Database2025 · 2 citations