PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Asian Spine Journal4 citationsOpen Access

Incidence of C5 palsy in anterior cervical decompression & fusion, posterior cervical decompression & fusion and laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,231 cases

View Full Paper
SMSathish MuthuGKGuna Pratheep KalanjiyamSMSathish Munisamy

Key Points

  • The overall incidence of postoperative c5 palsy was identified as 7% across various surgical techniques.
  • Circumferential fusion showed the highest incidence rate of c5 palsy at 16%, compared to 4% in anterior cervical decompression.
  • Notable risk factors for c5 palsy included male sex, intervertebral stenosis, and specific surgical approaches.
  • The analysis suggests laminoplasty may lower c5 palsy risk compared to laminectomy, emphasizing surgical technique considerations.

Abstract

C5 palsy (C5P) is a common, yet poorly understood complication of cervical decompressive surgery, causing substantial disability and impacting postoperative quality of life. Despite extensive research, the actual incidence and distribution of C5P across different cervical surgical approaches over the past decade remain unclear. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on October 15, 2024, across Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies reporting C5P incidence following surgery for degenerative cervical conditions, published until 2024, were included, excluding reviews, opinions, letters, and non-English manuscripts. Ninety-seven articles were included, encompassing 21,231 patients undergoing decompressive cervical surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. The overall incidence of postoperative C5P was 7% (95% confidence interval CI, 4%-10%). The highest incidence was observed with circumferential fusion (combined anterior-posterior approach) at 16% (95% CI, 8%-24%), while the lowest was with anterior cervical decompression and fusion at 4% (95% CI, 3%-5%). Incidence rates following laminoplasty and laminectomy and fusion were 6% (95% CI, 5%-7%) and 10% (95% CI, 8%-12%), respectively. Recovery time ranged from 20.9 to 35 weeks, with 19.1%-33% of patients experiencing residual weakness. Significant risk factors included male sex, preoperative intervertebral foraminal stenosis, ossified posterior longitudinal ligament, open-door laminoplasty, laminectomy (with/without fusion), and excessive spinal cord shift. The role of C4-5 foraminotomy remains contested. Our meta-analysis identifies the posterior surgical approach as a significant risk factor for C5P. Circumferential fusion poses the highest risk, while laminoplasty can reduce the risk compared to laminectomy (alone or with instrumented fusion).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muthu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc12cc8a7d58c25ebb0b2bhttps://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis2015 · 143 citations
  2. 2Risk Factor Analysis for C5 Palsy after Double-Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy2016 · 37 citations
  3. 3Operative Procedure and Results of Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty1988 · 380 citations
  4. 4Investigation of Segmental Motor Paralysis After Cervical Laminoplasty Using Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring With Transcranial Electric Motor-evoked Potentials2012 · 31 citations
  5. 5Effect of Lamina Open Angles in Expansion Open-door Laminoplasty on the Clinical Results in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy2012 · 46 citations