Solar System experiments reveal insights into dark energy and dark matter, suggesting their unique value alongside cosmological probes.
We reassess the realistic discovery reach of Solar System experiments for dark energy (DE) and dark matter (DM) and quantify their complementarity to dedicated cosmological probes, such as the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and Euclid mission. In scalar-tensor frameworks with universal conformal coupling A(ϕ), screening (chameleon/symmetron, Vainshtein) suppresses fifth forces in deep Solar potentials, consistent with the gravitational-wave speed bound |cT/c - 1| < 10⁻¹⁵. We treat Solar-System tests as hypothesis-driven probes: we assemble quantitative guardrails (MICROSCOPE η, Cassini γ, LLR G/G and SEP, ephemeris limits on ρ_DM and Yukawa α(λ), and clock-network searches for ultralight DM), place them alongside current cosmology posteriors, and provide an explicit map from cosmology-level linear response (e.g., μlin,0) to local residuals using the screening relations (thin-shell and Vainshtein). Guided by systematics-gated criteria, we outline a near-term program -- solar-conjunction Shapiro-delay and Doppler/range tests, sustained millimeter-class LLR, global optical-clock links, refined ephemerides, and spaceborne atom interferometry (AIS) -- with realistic sensitivities |γ-1|< (2-5) × 10⁻⁶ per conjunction, ηEEP ~ 10⁻¹⁶-10⁻¹⁷ (AIS), |Ġ/G| < (1-3) × 10⁻¹⁴ yr⁻¹ (near-term; with LLR next-gen stations and CCRs, few x 10⁻¹⁵), a uniform ~2x tightening of AU-scale Yukawa/DM-density bounds, and (3-10)x gains in ultralight-DM couplings from clock networks. Primary discovery potential for late-time dark energy lies with multi-probe cosmology (geometry and growth), while a hypothesis-driven Solar System program supplies high-leverage falsification and selective discovery windows for dark matter with ultralight mediators or long-range forces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slava G. Turyshev (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: