Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) face fundamental algorithmic challenges in real-world applications due to a combination of data heterogeneity, adversarial heterophily, and severe class imbalance. A critical research gap exists for a unified framework that can simultaneously address these issues, limiting the deployment of GNNs in high-stakes domains like financial fraud detection and social network analysis. This paper introduces HAG-CFNet, a novel framework designed to bridge this gap by integrating three key innovations: (1) a heterogeneity-aware message-passing mechanism that uses relation-specific attention to capture rich semantic information; (2) a dual-channel heterophily detection module that explicitly identifies and neutralizes adversarial camouflage through separate aggregation pathways; and (3) a domain-aware counterfactual generator that produces plausible, actionable explanations by co-optimizing feature and structural perturbations. These are supported by a synergistic imbalance correction strategy combining graph-adapted oversampling with cost-sensitive learning. Extensive testing on large-scale financial datasets validates the framework’s impact: HAG-CFNet achieves a 4.2% AUC-PR improvement over state-of-the-art methods, demonstrates superior robustness by reducing performance degradation under structural noise by over 50%, and generates counterfactual explanations with 91.8% validity while requiring minimal perturbations. These advances provide a direct pathway to building more trustworthy and effective AI systems for critical applications ranging from financial risk management to supply chain analysis and social media content moderation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
H. J. Yang
Northwest University
Y. Zhou
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Xianzhe Ji
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
Mathematics
University of Glasgow
Jilin University
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc12d38a7d58c25ebb0efc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math13182956
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: