Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Numerical modeling demonstrates improved energy performance in a phase change thermal energy storage system, suggesting optimized porosity configurations.
Thermal energy storage (TES) is a crucial technology for mitigating energy supply–demand mismatches and facilitating the integration of renewable energy. This study proposes a novel horizontal phase change TES unit integrated with partially filled metal foam (MF) and fins, divided into six sub-regions (ε1–ε6) with graded pore parameters. A comprehensive numerical model is developed to investigate the synergistic heat exchange mechanism and energy storage performance. The results demonstrate that porosity in Porosity-1 (ε1) and Porosity-2 (ε2) regions dominates melting dynamics. Through multi-objective optimization, targeting both minimal energy storage time and maximal energy storage rate, an optimal configuration (Case TD) is derived after technical design. Case TD features porosity values ε1 = ε2 = ε3 = ε5 = ε6 = 0.97 and ε4 = 0.98, where the graded porosity distribution balances heat conduction efficiency and energy storage capacity. Compared to the uniform MF case (Case 1) and the fin-only case (Case 6), Case TD reduces TES time by 51.75% and 17.39%, respectively, while increasing the mean TES rate by 102.55% and 19.12%, respectively. This design minimizes the TES capacity loss (only decreasing by 2.14% compared to Case 1) while maximizing the energy storage density and improving the efficiency–cost trade-off of the phase-change material-based system. It provides a scalable solution for rapid-response TES applications in solar thermal power plants and industrial waste heat recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: