Qualitative analysis reveals how urban development and welfare structures affect food access, suggesting deeper systems at play in food insecurity.
Urban food insecurity in high‐income countries is rising, and its health outcomes and determinants have been well documented. There are, however, limited qualitative, place‐based studies of how people become, or remain, food insecure, especially in EU cities. This article introduces infrastructural violence to explore the complexities of food insecurity and its underlying (infra)structural causes in the urban food environment of Amsterdam’s northern city district, Noord, since the Covid‐19 pandemic. We build on interviews (2023–2024) with 28 food bank users, volunteers, funders and network representatives, social workers, and municipal staff, carried out in a community geography project. Our findings show a complex interplay of food retail, urban development, welfare, and community food bank infrastructures. Key findings are that urban development affects food security in various ways, and that welfare and community food bank infrastructures, which ideally alleviate food insecurity, can, in fact, exclude people from accessing healthy and affordable food and cause additional harms of administrative burdens, fear, and shame. We further trace the identified infrastructures as place‐based embodiments of wider structures, variably including: housing marketization, supermarket corporatization, historical relations between residents and the state, welfare bureaucratisation, social service decentralization, and austerity politics. This study illuminates the (infra)structural complexities underpinning food insecurity in a changing urban food environment, and discusses their implications for urban food governance research and policymaking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: