PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders4 citationsOpen Access

Brief cognitive screening tools for dementia in low-educated population from South America: A systematic review

View Full Paper
DCDiego Chambergo‐MichilotNCNilton CustodioRMRosa Montesinos

Key Points

  • Brief cognitive screening tools for dementia show over 90% sensitivity and specificity in low-educated adults.
  • Seventeen tests were analyzed, revealing the Mini-Mental State Examination as a common and accurate tool.
  • The review involved searching four databases, yielding crucial insights into dementia screening in South America.
  • Adjustments of cut-off points for tests may enhance cognitive evaluations in illiterate populations.

Abstract

Introduction. Despite less education being common in Latin America, there is no systematic review on the use of brief cognitive screening tools in illiterate and low-educated adults in the region. We systematically reviewed brief cognitive tests used to identify dementia in illiterate or low-educated adults from South America. Methods. A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. We searched four major databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE, for studies up to September 2023, and included observational studies that reported at least sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value of dementia screening tools in illiterate or low-educated (less than 6 years of education) adults from South America. Results. Most studies in samples with illiteracy or low education across South America used brief cognitive screening tools adapted to the local population's language. Seventeen tests were identified, among them the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale(RUDAS) were the more common tools with good diagnostic accuracy in people with dementia. The sensitivity and specificity of reported brief cognitive screening tools were at least 90% and the area under the ROC curve was higher than 0.95. Conclusions. The cut-off points for detecting dementia in illiterates and the low-educated adult population of South America should be adjusted for most brief cognitive tests. Developing specific and sensitive cognitive batteries for our region for cognitive evaluation in low-educated/illiterate participants is mandatory, including specific functionality evaluation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chambergo‐Michilot et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc1e308a7d58c25ebb15c2https://doi.org/10.1159/000548735
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Psychosocial Factors That Shape Patient and Carer Experiences of Dementia Diagnosis and Treatment: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies2012 · 270 citations
  2. 2Mini exame dos estado mental e o diagnóstico de demência no Brasil1998 · 421 citations
  3. 3Cross Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of Research Instruments: a Methodological Review2016 · 356 citations
  4. 4Assessing the Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease in Real-World Settings in Three European Countries2021 · 15 citations
  5. 5What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education2020 · 99 citations