This analysis reveals communication patterns and linguistic features in Supreme Court cases, highlighting their implications.
This study examines the specialized communication patterns in Nigerian Presidential Election Petition Tribunal judgments through a genre-based analysis framework. Using Halliday's Generic Structure Pattern (GSP) as the theoretical foundation, the research analyzes the linguistic features, rhetorical strategies, and structural elements that characterize this specialized legal discourse. The study focuses on the 2023 Presidential Election Petition cases, particularly the Supreme Court judgment in Atiku v. INEC (No. 2) [2023] 19 NWLR, to identify recurring patterns and develop a comprehensive GSP equation for this genre. The findings reveal a systematic structure comprising both obligatory and optional elements that serve specific communicative functions within the Nigerian legal system. This research contributes to the understanding of legal discourse in post-colonial contexts and provides insights into how specialized communication operates within institutional frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agbeleoba et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: