PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Journal of Clinical Oncology13 citations

Neoadjuvant CTLA-4/PD-(L)1 Blockade Versus Surgery +/− Chemotherapy in Deficient Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability–High Resectable Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis

View Full Paper
ARAlessandra RaimondiGTGabriele TinèABAlexej Ballhausen

Key Points

  • Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly improve pathologic response in dMMR/MSI-H gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma compared to chemotherapy.
  • Among 197 patients, those treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed a pathologic complete response rate of 61.9%, significantly higher than chemotherapy's 3.7%.
  • This analysis utilized individual patient data pooling to assess treatment outcomes and progression in high-risk patients with resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
  • Higher rates of ypN0 and lower ypT4 after immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to chemotherapy indicate potential for changing treatment approaches.

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) have better survival after surgery and scant/no benefit from chemotherapy. Preoperative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrated a high proportion of major complete pathologic response, possibly allowing chemotherapy/surgery-free approaches. METHODS Individual patient data pooled analysis was performed to determine an optimal strategy for resectable dMMR/MSI-H GEA. Patients were stratified across four groups: neoadjuvant dual CTLA-4/PD-(L)1 ICIs with or without surgery, perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) and surgery, and surgery alone or with older perioperative/adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Primary end points were pathologic complete and major complete pathologic response proportion (pathologic complete response pCR, tumor regression grade TRG1a, major pathologic response MPR, TRG1a/b Becker criteria) in resected patients. Secondary end points were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall population. RESULTS Among 197 patients, 49 received ICIs, 27 FLOT, 33 surgery alone, and 88 older chemotherapy regimens. Among 69 patients who underwent surgery after ICIs or FLOT, ICIs demonstrated significantly higher pathologic response versus FLOT (pCR, 61.9% v 3.7%; odds ratio OR, 54.8; P = .002; MPR, 78.6% v 10%; OR, 39.3; P < .001) and lower ypN+ (14.3% v 37%; OR, 4.2; P = .015) and ypT (OR, 16.4; P < .001) stage. No significant differences in EFS/OS were observed (the 36-month EFS and OS were 70.4% v 80.6% and 72.7% v 90.4% with ICI v surgery alone). Residual nodal disease (ypN+) or ypT4 status after neoadjuvant ICIs or FLOT and nonpathologic response status were associated with inferior progression-free survival/OS. CONCLUSION In resectable dMMR/MSI-H GEA, neoadjuvant ICIs significantly increase pathologic response and downstaging versus FLOT, with comparable EFS/OS with surgery with or without chemotherapy. The higher proportion of ypN0 and lack of ypT4 after neoadjuvant ICIs versus FLOT should drive preoperative treatment choices in clinical high-risk disease. The high proportion of pCR/MPR with ICIs provides rationale for exploring organ-sparing surgery or nonoperative management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raimondi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc1e3b8a7d58c25ebb1c6dhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-00447
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries2024 · 25,401 citations
  2. 2Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Value of Microsatellite Instability As a Biomarker in Gastric Cancer2019 · 493 citations
  3. 3Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Adjuvant Nivolumab in Localized Deficient Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability–High Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: The GERCOR NEONIPIGA Phase II Study2022 · 402 citations
  4. 4Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer2021 · 1,761 citations
  5. 5Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up2022 · 1,498 citations