This article examines friction points in Portuguese tax law with pillar two, suggesting a need for reform to enhance competitiveness.
This article analyses the implementation of the Minimum Taxation Directive (2022/2523) in Portugal, identifying friction points between the Portuguese tax framework and Pillar Two. These areas range from the unlikely qualification of autonomous taxation as a covered tax for Portuguese Pillar Two purposes, to an analysis of Portuguese tax incentives, which may lower the Portuguese effective tax rate. The authors also address the expected Pillar Two implications on M&A transactions in Portugal. This contribution demonstrates that, albeit contributing to increased tax complexity, Pillar Two offers an opportunity to rethink some features of the Portuguese tax framework and enhance its competitiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chuaqui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: