PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Security and Defence Quarterly6 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of the power of drones and limitations of the anti-drone solutions on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield

View Full Paper
MCMohamed Zied Chaari

Key Points

  • Drones can inflict significant damage on tanks worth $4 million, while costing less than $1,000 each.
  • Current anti-drone solutions like lasers and jammers are ineffective, failing to neutralize weaponized drones.
  • Both Russian and Ukrainian forces adopt new strategies, using metal grids and nylon nets to counter drone threats.
  • The rapid proliferation of drones necessitates advancements in counter-drone measures to ensure battlefield effectiveness.

Abstract

The recent and rapid growth of low-cost, sophisticated drones, along with the associated technological challenges, is a notable feature of warfare tactics. As the Russians and Ukrainians become more dependent on these cost-effective yet crude drones, they establish a new battlefield characterised by high efficacy and low cost. Both Russian and Ukrainian forces launch drones to target each other. Drones locate their targets, perhaps with low efficacy, but they can cause significant destruction. Drones can destroy and carbonise tanks, which cost about 4 million each. However, the unit price of drones does not exceed 1, 000. The limitations and ineffectiveness of most anti-drone devices currently on the market, including lasers, high-power microwaves, and radio frequency jammers, are evident in the increasing ubiquity of drones. This case study suggests that current counter-drone technologies are unable to neutralise kamikaze and weaponised drones on both sides. As a result of these failures, Russian and Ukrainian forces employ new technologies, such as metal grids and nylon net barriers, which are effective in destroying and stopping drones to some extent. This article presents a case study involving the reliance on drones by both warring sides, who have also been utilising anti-drone tactics since February 2022. The work investigates the solutions currently available to both adversaries for reducing the impact of weaponised drones on the battlefield. This study evaluates them and demonstrates how their inherent drawbacks could motivate the development of new strategies and countermeasures against armed drones.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mohamed Zied Chaari (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc1e3f8a7d58c25ebb1ea5https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/208347
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AN AI-BASED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR THE SECOND LINE OF DEFENSE AGAINST IRREGULAR MIGRATION, SMUGGLING, AND TERRORISM: GENDARMERIE ASSESSMENT2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Remote learning during the war: challenges for higher education in Ukraine2022 · 28 citations
  3. 3Improving Radar Detection of Drones and Air Mobility Systems in Urban Areas2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4UAV Hunter: A Net-Capturing UAV System with Improved Detection and Tracking Methods for Anti-UAV Defense2024 · 23 citations
  5. 5REGARDING THE FEATURES OF THE COMBAT APPLICATION OF FPV DRONES IN THE WAR BETWEEN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE2024 · 11 citations