This study demonstrates the impact of psychological support on labor efficiency indicators, suggesting enhanced motivation and career growth.
The object of the study is psychological aspects of the effectiveness of labor activity. The subject of the study is the internal psychological mechanisms that affect a person's interest in the profession, the need for professional development and self-realization, career growth, attitude to work, colleagues, organizations, as well as his motivational values. The purpose of the study is to deepen the theoretical and methodological provisions, to study the indicators of labor efficiency before and after the implementation of the psychological support program and to develop scientific and practical recommendations on psychological support as a mechanism for ensuring the effectiveness of labor. In the course of the study, psychological indicators of labor efficiency were identified. The author of the article presents an original program of psychological support aimed at regulating the stress level of employees in accordance with the effectiveness of work. The methodology of the article is based on the research of the domestic and foreign scientists, revealing the psychological factors affecting the effectiveness of work, as well as psychological support in conditions of increased stress at different stages of work. The study uses theoretical (comparative analysis) and empirical research methods (conversation, questionnaire). The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that in the scientific and practical field of knowledge, the problem of the influence of psychological mechanisms on the effectiveness of labor activity has become one of the central aspects of economic efficiency. The practical significance lies in the fact that the conducted research expands the range of knowledge about the specifics of psychological support as a mechanism that increases the efficiency of work. The developed program of psychological support for employees of the organization can be used by psychologists of psychological services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elena Vladimirovna Soboleva (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: