PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Energies6 citationsOpen Access

Research on New Energy Power Generation Forecasting Method Based on Bi-LSTM and Transformer

View Full Paper
HHHao HeWHWei HeJGJun Guo

Key Points

  • The Transformer–BiLSTM model improved forecasting accuracy by 35% for PV plants compared to Bi-LSTM, indicating enhanced predictive capabilities.
  • Bi-LSTM outperformed LSTM by achieving a 24% higher accuracy in wind farms due to its ability to mitigate time-lag issues.
  • Experimental results reveal that LSTM faces systematic biases, while Bi-LSTM and Transformer–BiLSTM models effectively reduce extreme-value errors.
  • Findings highlight the need for improved computational efficiency and multi-source data handling in future forecasting studies.

Abstract

With the increasing penetration of wind and photovoltaic (PV) power in modern power systems, accurate power forecasting has become crucial for ensuring grid stability and optimizing dispatch strategies. This study focuses on multiple wind farms and PV plants, where three deep learning models—Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and a hybrid Transformer–BiLSTM model—are constructed and systematically compared to enhance forecasting accuracy and dynamic responsiveness. First, the predictive performance of each model across different power stations is analyzed. The results reveal that the LSTM model suffers from systematic bias and lag effects in extreme value ranges, while Bi-LSTM demonstrates advantages in mitigating time-lag issues and improving dynamic fitting, achieving on average a 24% improvement in accuracy for wind farms and a 20% improvement for PV plants compared with LSTM. Moreover, the Transformer–BiLSTM model significantly strengthens the ability to capture complex temporal dependencies and extreme power fluctuations. Experimental results indicate that the Transformer–BiLSTM consistently delivers higher forecasting accuracy and stability across all test sites, effectively reducing extreme-value errors and prediction delays. Compared with Bi-LSTM, its average accuracy improves by 19% in wind farms and 35% in PV plants. Finally, this paper discusses the limitations of the current models in terms of multi-source data fusion, outlier handling, and computational efficiency, and outlines directions for future research. The findings provide strong technical support for renewable energy power forecasting, thereby facilitating efficient scheduling and risk management in smart grids.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

He et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc1e438a7d58c25ebb2397https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195165
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimal Joint Scheduling and Forecasting of Photovoltaic and Wind Power Generation Based on Transformer-BiLSTM2026
  2. 2Ultrashort-Term Prediction of Photovoltaic Power Based on a Bidirectional LSTM Model2026
  3. 3Winds of Change: Enhancing Wind Power Generation Forecasting with LSTM Models and Advanced Techniques in a Single Turbine Wind Farm2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4Residential Photovoltaic Generation Forecast via Long Short-Term Memory and Transformer2026
  5. 5A transformer-based wind power forecasting model with multi-scale power difference embedding2025 · 1 citations