This analysis highlights environmental filtering in community assembly for microbes and macro-organisms, suggesting a dynamic interaction between abiotic factors and biotic communities.
More than five decades before the introduction of “environmental filtering” in plant and vegetation sciences, Baas Becking proposed that the “environment selects” for studies in microbial ecology. He coupled this with the ubiquity law that he proposed for microbes to obtain the tenet “everything is everywhere, but, the environment selects”. Nowadays, while this tenet is mostly used as a null hypothesis for studies of microbial biogeography, the latter part has large implications for niche assembly theories. In this respect, it is very similar to the idea of “environmental filtering”, although some minor differences exist regarding how both concepts have been applied in macrobial and microbial ecologies. During the second decade of the 21st century, the usefulness of the latter has been questioned due to difficulties in disentangling the roles of environmental (abiotic) and ecological interaction in community assembly. A new vision has emerged in the literature that considers the environmental filter as dynamic and continuously influenced by biotic communities. With a small modification, this scheme provides a solution that can accommodate the ecologies of both microbes and macro-organisms for a common niche assembly theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rutger de Wit (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: