Randomized block design evaluated polyhalite's effect on macronutrients and dry mass in Urochloa, indicating significant recovery benefits.
Grasslands cover more than 25% of the Earth’s surface and play essential ecological roles, such as forage production, supporting pollinators, and carbon sequestration. This study aimed to evaluate the recovery of a degraded pasture of Urochloa decumbens cv. Basilisk through aerial dry mass production, plant height, and foliar macronutrients concentration and uptake after fertilization with polyhalite. The experiment was carried out at the Teaching, Research, and Extension Farm of the School of Agrarian and Technological Sciences, UNESP—Dracena Campus, in a dystrophic red–yellow latosol soil. A randomized block design with four replications was used. The treatments included the following: (T1) control, (T2) N + P + liming, (T3) T2 + 30 kg ha−1 K2O (polyhalite), (T4) T2 + 60 kg ha−1 K2O (polyhalite), (T5) T2 + 60 (30 + 30) kg ha−1 K2O (polyhalite), and (T6) 60 kg ha−1 K2O (polyhalite). The treatment with N + P + liming + 60 kg ha−1 K2O (polyhalite) resulted in 93% more dry mass production when compared with the control treatment. This treatment was most effective for grassland recovery, whereas polyhalite alone was ineffective. Tissue N and S concentrations increased as a result of the addition of N + P + liming + 60 kg ha−1 K2O (polyhalite).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: