Development integrates localization and quality classification in shoulder-joint radiographs, suggesting improved accuracy.
Purpose: To develop and validate a two-stage system for automated quality assessment of shoulder true-AP radiographs by combining joint localization with quality classification. Materials and Methods: From the MURA “SHOULDER” subset, 2956 anteroposterior images were identified; 59 images with negative–positive inversion, excessive metallic implants, extreme exposure, or presumed fluoroscopy were excluded, yielding a class-balanced set of 2800 images (1400 OK/1400 NG). A YOLOX-based detector localized the glenohumeral joint, and classifiers operated on both whole images and detector-centered crops. To enhance interpretability, we integrated Grad-CAM into both whole-image and local classifiers and assessed attention patterns against radiographic criteria. Results: The detector achieved AP@0.5 = 1.00 and a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.967. The classifier attained AUC = 0.977 (F1 = 0.943) on a held-out test set. Heat map analyses indicated anatomically focused attention consistent with expert-defined regions, and coverage metrics favored local over whole-image models. Conclusions: The two-stage, XAI-integrated approach provides accurate and interpretable assessment of shoulder true-AP image quality, aligning model attention with radiographic criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekiura et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: