Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational analysis highlights SERPINE1's role in migraine and suggests esculetin as a multi-target therapy.
Migraine is a multifactorial neurovascular disorder involving aberrant neuronal excitability, vascular dysregulation, and neuroinflammation. Current therapies often provide incomplete relief and may cause adverse effects, highlighting the need for safer, multi-target interventions. This study explored the potential anti-migraine mechanisms of esculetin, a naturally occurring coumarin derivative with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and vasomodulatory properties. Network pharmacology identified SERPINE1 (serpin family E member 1), GSK3B (glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta), STAT1 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 1), IRAK1 (interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1), and CA12 (carbonic anhydrase 12) as hub targets linked to Toll-like receptor signaling, neuroinflammatory regulation, and vascular remodeling. Molecular docking ranked SERPINE1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, PAI-1; PDB: 4AQH) as the highest-affinity target (−7.50 kcal/mol) via dual hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking, followed by GSK3B and STAT1. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations confirmed stable esculetin–SERPINE1 binding with consistent root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) and persistent hydrogen bond occupancy, indicating sustained interaction under physiological conditions. In vitro assays using U-87 glioblastoma cells showed preserved viability (>85%) at 6.25–50 μM, while higher concentrations induced dose-dependent cytotoxicity (half-maximal inhibitory concentration, IC₅₀ ≈ 220 μM). 2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA) fluorescence revealed elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels at IC₅₀, suggesting oxidative stress contributes to high-dose cytotoxicity. These findings suggest esculetin may act as a multi-target migraine modulator, particularly via SERPINE1 inhibition, with a dose-dependent shift from neuroprotection to oxidative stress induction. Further in vivo validation and blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability studies are warranted to assess clinical translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: