PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025Veteran Law Review0 citations

Juridical Analysis of Punishment for Perpetrators of the Crime of Human Trafficking

View Full Paper
WSWinda SimbolonUniversitas Prima IndonesiaSSSarida Hotdeliana SimanjuntakUniversitas Prima IndonesiaISIwan SetyawanDiponegoro University

Key Points

  • Sentencing for human trafficking remains inadequate despite legal provisions, highlighting systemic flaws.
  • The Supreme Court upheld a seven-year sentence for a trafficking case, indicating potential limitations in enforcement.
  • Normative legal research utilizing statutory and case analyses reveals obstacles in effective sentencing.
  • The findings urge a reevaluation of sentencing effectiveness and call for enhanced law enforcement in human trafficking.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the sentencing of human trafficking perpetrators based on the Supreme Court Decision No. 1318 PK/Pid.Sus/2023. Despite existing laws, human trafficking remains prevalent in Indonesia. The objective of this research is to understand how the Indonesian judicial system imposes criminal sanctions and to analyze the factors that influence the judges' decisions. This is normative legal research using statutory and case approaches. The case analyzed involves a defendant convicted under Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 48 and Article 4 in conjunction with Article 48 of Law No. 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of Human Trafficking. The perpetrator was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment, a fine of IDR 120,000,000.00, and restitution of IDR 117,000,000.00 to the victim. The petition for judicial review was rejected by the Supreme Court due to the failure of the new evidence to qualify as novum. The findings show that although legal provisions are in place, obstacles persist in ensuring a deterrent effect. This study highlights the need to evaluate sentencing effectiveness and strengthen law enforcement in handling human trafficking cases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Simbolon et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc26218a7d58c25ebb2cc4https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v8i1.10880
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analysis of the Implementation of Victim Protection Principles in Trafficking in Persons: A Case Study of Supreme Court Decisions of the Republic of Indonesia2025
  2. 2Enforcement of the Criminal Act of Trafficking in Women2024
  3. 3Legal Protection for Children as Victims of Human Trafficking (Study of Decision Number 98/Pid.Sus/2020/Pn.Kot)2025
  4. 4Enhancing Legal Safeguards for Human Trafficking Victims in Indonesia2024
  5. 5Fulfillment of Restitution Rights for Victims of Human Trafficking Crimes2025