PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2025European Journal of Neurology4 citationsOpen Access

Clinically Relevant Patterns of Co‐Fluctuating Structure and Function in Multiple Sclerosis

View Full Paper
JZJian ZhangMBMarco BattagliniRCRosa Cortese

Key Points

  • Significant co-fluctuating patterns distinguished multiple sclerosis from healthy controls, impacting clinical outcomes.
  • The analysis involved 147 patients with MS and 57 healthy controls, revealing decreased fractional anisotropy and increased lesion probability.
  • Graph theory identified eight brain sub-networks, indicating regions with interconnected structural and functional changes.
  • Findings suggest that these patterns better explain physical and cognitive disability than traditional MRI metrics.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background While structural and functional connectivity changes in multiple sclerosis (MS) are well documented, their complex interplay remains poorly understood. This study identifies co‐fluctuating patterns of structural and functional changes in MS using an MRI‐based multimodal fusion approach and assesses the added value to clinical outcomes. Methods Linked independent component analysis (ICA) was applied to spatial maps of white matter (WM) lesions, fractional anisotropy (FA), gray matter (GM) volume, and functional network connectivity to detect regions with differential co‐fluctuations. Graph theory (GT) was then used to reveal clusters of interconnected brain regions. Linear mixed‐effect models targeted regions with significantly different co‐fluctuating patterns between MS and HC. Multivariate stepwise regressions analyzed the associations between co‐fluctuating patterns and disability and cognitive dysfunction. Results The study included 147 patients with MS and 57 HC. Significant co‐fluctuating patterns of decreased FA, increased lesion probability in the thalamic radiation and corpus callosum, GM atrophy in sensorimotor and thalamic areas, and enhanced functional connectivity in the temporal parietal network distinguished MS from HC ( p < 0.001). GT revealed eight brain sub‐networks of spatially connected clusters. Regional‐ and modality‐specific loadings and GT changes explained physical (adjusted R 2 = 0.51, p < 0.001) and cognitive (adjusted R 2 = 0.44, p < 0.001) disability better than traditional MRI measures (adjusted R 2 = 0.12–0.33, p < 0.001). Conclusions Our multimodal MRI approach revealed co‐fluctuating regional patterns of lesions, structural disconnection, and functional hyperconnectivity in MS, offering a more comprehensive explanation of clinical outcomes than traditional MRI metrics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc26218a7d58c25ebb2d0chttps://doi.org/10.1111/ene.70367
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper