Systematic review identifies 15 statistical methods for mood instability in psychiatric conditions, suggesting the need for standardization.
Background/Objectives: Our understanding of mood instability as a clinically important feature of many psychiatric conditions has been increasing over the last decade, but there remains a lack of clarity around the optimal ways to calculate mood instability in real time. We conducted a systematic review in order to describe the statistical methods used in studies investigating mood instability that collected mood data using ESM (Experience Sampling Methodology). Results: From a total of 229 papers, we found 15 discrete statistical methods were used a total of 319 times. In 76 (33%) studies, more than one statistical method was used, and 39 (17%) studies employed distinct statistical methods for particular aspects of affect dynamics. Conclusions: Based on our findings, we recommend standardisation of statistical methods to strengthen future research on mood instability and ultimately support better clinical outcomes for individuals with mood difficulties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cairns et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: