Comparative analysis uncovers diverse circular RNA responses in porcine alveolar macrophages, highlighting interferon’s role in antiviral immune responses.
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) causes significant economic losses in the swine industry. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a class of stable non-coding RNAs, are increasingly recognized as regulators in immune responses and host–virus interactions. This study investigated the genome-wide circRNA responses in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs), key cell targets of PRRSV, following treatment with a modified live virus (MLV) vaccine or two interferon (IFN) subtypes (IFN-α1, IFN-ω5). Using RNA sequencing, we identified over 1000 differentially expressed circRNAs across treatment groups, revealing both conserved and distinct expression profiles. Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway analyses indicated that circRNA-associated genes are significantly enriched in immune-related processes and pathways, including cytokine signaling and antiviral defense. Notably, IFN-ω5 treatment induced a pronounced circRNA response, aligning with its potent antiviral activity. We further explored the regulatory potential of these circRNAs by predicting miRNA binding sites, revealing complex circRNA-miRNA interaction networks. Additionally, we assessed the coding potential of differentially expressed circRNAs by identifying open reading frames (ORFs), internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs), and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification sites, suggesting a subset may undergo non-canonical translation. These findings provide a comprehensive landscape of circRNA expression in PAMs under different antiviral conditions, highlighting their potential roles as immune regulators and novel players in interferon-mediated antiviral responses, particularly downstream of IFN-ω5. This work contributes to understanding the non-coding RNA landscape in the PRRSV-swine model and suggests circRNAs as potential targets for future antiviral strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: