The article examines L.P. Stankevich's concept to address digital ethics challenges, highlighting algorithmic bias and responsibility.
The article examines the relevance of L.P. Stankevich's concept of ethics of responsibility for solving modern ethical challenges of the digital age. The key principles of a holistic approach to responsibility are analyzed, including the relationship between actions and their consequences, as well as the balance between individual and collective responsibility. Particular attention is paid to the application of this concept to the problems of digital ethics, artificial intelligence and social networks, including issues of privacy, algorithmic bias, disinformation and data manipulation. The paper examines in detail practical mechanisms for implementing ethics of responsibility, such as the creation of ethical committees on AI, ensuring transparency of algorithms and the development of digital literacy. The critical analysis reveals the limitations of the approach related to the global nature of digital technologies, the conflict between freedom and control, as well as the need to integrate with alternative ethical paradigms. The article demonstrates that Stankevich's concept retains its heuristic value, but requires adaptation to new technological realities. In conclusion, promising areas of further research are proposed, including the development of multi-level responsibility models for complex digital ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sophia A. Makarova (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: