Experimental research shows that adding opoka improves gas-ceramic properties, highlighting its low thermal conductivity and enhanced strength.
The article presents the results of scientific and experimental research on the development of highly porous gas-ceramics based on low-plasticity clay from the Rubezhinsk deposit. As a mineral additive, highly dispersed microporous siliceous rock-opoka from the Taskala deposit was used. Opoka is a lightweight, hard, microporous rock characterized by high natural porosity (55-60%) and a density of 1.3-1.5 g/cm³. Hydrogen peroxide, chemically composed of H₂O₂ (perhydrol), was employed as the foaming agent. The raw clay material contains 68% SiO₂, 11.8% Al₂O₃, 3.6% Fe₂O₃, and 5.6% CaO, and is classified as low-plasticity with a plasticity index of 6.5%. X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that the clay is predominantly composed of quartz, feldspar, calcite, and hematite, while the opoka consists primarily of amorphous silica. Experimental studies demonstrated that introducing 10-30% finely ground opoka into the clay slip reduces sedimentation of molded samples during drying from 12% (without additive) to 4% (at 30% opoka), thereby decreasing shrinkage and accelerating structural strength development by 10-15%. The resulting gas-ceramic samples exhibited average densities ranging from 565 to 785 kg/m³, compressive strength between 2.5 and 3.8 MPa, total porosity from 68.4% to 75.2%, and thermal conductivity values of 0.18–0.24 W/m·°C. These results indicate that the use of siliceous opoka significantly improves the performance characteristics of porous ceramics. Thus, the developed gas-ceramic materials combine low density, enhanced strength, and low thermal conductivity, making them suitable for use as effective structural-thermal insulation components in building envelope systems, particularly for the northern regions of Kazakhstan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montayev et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: