RORing ahead: using ROR in place of the Open Funder Registry

Rachael Lammey

doi:10.64000/xk685-z4429

January 30, 2024Open Access

RORing ahead: using ROR in place of the Open Funder Registry

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Transitioning to ROR may enhance tracking and management of funder affiliations, and improve usability.
The decision to deprecate the Open Funder Registry aligns with emerging needs for more integrated solutions.
Utilizing ROR registry instead of Open Funder Registry will benefit both researchers and funding organizations.
This change emphasizes the importance of adopting streamlined systems in supporting research funding.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Announcement reveals ROR replaces Open Funder Registry for affiliation and funder needs, suggesting improved support.

Abstract

A few months ago we announced our plan to deprecate our support for the Open Funder Registry in favour of using the ROR Registry to support both affiliation and funder use cases.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Rachael Lammey (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc27558a7d58c25ebb3903 https://doi.org/10.64000/xk685-z4429

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

RORing ahead: using ROR in place of the Open Funder Registry

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

RORing ahead: using ROR in place of the Open Funder Registry

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading