The more the merrier, or how more registered grants means more relationships with outputs

Dominika Tkaczyk; Rachael Lammey; Ginny Hendricks

doi:10.64000/5f5a8-3ze18

February 22, 2023Open Access

The more the merrier, or how more registered grants means more relationships with outputs

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

More registered grants increases the automatic matching of research outputs to specific awards, enhancing reporting efficiency.
A primary metric highlights that enhanced relationships from grant registrations lead to improved tracking of academic outputs.
This observational analysis explores the interactions between funders and researchers in relation to Crossref's role.
Findings indicate that higher registration levels could signify a push for better transparency and accountability in funding.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Analysis finds registered grants enhance research output tracking, suggesting better funder accountability.

Abstract

One of the main motivators for funders registering grants with Crossref is to simplify the process of research reporting with more automatic matching of research outputs to specific awards.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Tkaczyk et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dc27558a7d58c25ebb3aed https://doi.org/10.64000/5f5a8-3ze18

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

The more the merrier, or how more registered grants means more relationships with outputs

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

The more the merrier, or how more registered grants means more relationships with outputs

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading