Discussion explores linking CrossTech to Crossref home page and publicizing member count, suggesting potential transparency benefits.
Just a couple comments about CrossTech: 1. Shouldn't it (or couldn't it) be linked to from the Crossref home page? (This is a public read list after all and so should be made more widely available.) Maybe at some point could be announced on some lists of interest. 2. Would be very nice to (at least) have a count of membership. I would also like to canvas opinions about making names of the membership public. What do others think about this?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tony Hammond (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: