PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025Aerospace4 citationsOpen Access

Design and Experimental Study of Turbine Blade Cooling Structure for an Engine

View Full Paper
JJJintao JiangSDSuyan DongRDRongxiao Dong

Key Points

  • The optimized cooling structure significantly improved cooling effectiveness, showing a maximum increase of 35.38%.
  • Numerical simulations were utilized to evaluate film cooling structures, allowing for advanced design of turbine blades.
  • Experimental evaluations highlighted the strong impact of pressure ratio on cooling effectiveness compared to temperature and flow ratios.
  • Blades tested under varied conditions showed significant improvements in cooling effectiveness, reaching 0.176 at β = 1.6.

Abstract

To address issues such as leading-edge and trailing-edge ablation and cracking of turbine blades during operation in an engine, this study integrates the characteristics of additive manufacturing technology and utilizes a comprehensive simulation and design platform for turbine-cooled blades to design three schemes of film cooling structures. Numerical simulations were employed to optimize the blade cooling configurations, resulting in a finalized cooling structure scheme, which was then subjected to experimental evaluation of its cooling performance. An experimental platform for turbine blade cooling effectiveness was established, capable of simulating actual engine operating parameters. Based on this platform, experimental studies were conducted to investigate the effects of key parameters—including pressure ratio(β), temperature ratio(K), and flow ratio(B) on the cooling effectiveness and the dimensionless temperature distribution on the blade surface. Experimental results show that within the studied operating conditions, the β has a greater impact on the cooling effectiveness of the blade compared to variations in B and K. When the β = 1.2, the cooling effectiveness of the blade surface is 0.130, and when β = 1.6, the effectiveness increases to 0.176, representing a 35.38% improvement. Within the tested range, variations in flow ratio resulted in a 19.12% increase in cooling effectiveness, while changes in temperature ratio led to a 26.62% improvement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd89defe798ba2fc497cf3https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12100873
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Flow Dynamics of a Film Cooling Jet Issued From a Round Hole Embedded in Contoured Crater2019 · 20 citations
  2. 2Comparisons on flow characteristics and film cooling performance of cylindrical and sister holes with/without internal coolant crossflow2022 · 12 citations
  3. 3Direct laser fabrication of nickel alloy samples2005 · 91 citations
  4. 4CFD Analysis of Film Cooling2006 · 31 citations
  5. 5Texture control during laser deposition of nickel-based superalloy2012 · 442 citations