Retrospective study uncovers similar outcomes for lower extremity artery disease patients with different ankle-brachial index levels, suggesting further assessment is needed.
The resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) is widely used to diagnose lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). However, some LEAD patients have a normal ABI yet require percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). This was a retrospective study of consecutive LEAD patients who underwent PTA. The patients were classified into two groups based on the ABI of the limb that underwent PTA: the ABI-normal group (ABI 0.91-1.40), and ABI-abnormal group (ABI ≤ 0.90 or > 1.40). The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCEs) and major adverse limb events (MALEs). Of the 334 patients (mean age: 70 ± 12 years, 60% male), 69 (21%) had a normal ABI, and 265 (79%) had an abnormal ABI. After a median follow-up of 1.5 (0.6-3.1) years, 84 (25%) patients reached the primary or secondary endpoints. The ABI-normal group had a higher proportion of males (73% vs. 57%, p = 0.02) and a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (78% vs. 56%, p < 0.01). Angiography revealed less severe lesions in the femoropopliteal artery (p < 0.01) and a lower rate of stent deployment (15% vs. 31%, p < 0.01) in the ABI-normal group than in the ABI-abnormal group. However, the incidence rates of MACCEs (29% vs. 24%, p = 0.56) and MALEs (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.63) were comparable in the two groups. LEAD patients with a normal ABI often have less severe above-the-knee artery lesions but similar poor outcomes, highlighting the need for additional hemodynamic assessments and increased clinical attention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: