PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025Healthcare2 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of Fenestrating vs. Reconstituting Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

View Full Paper
AAAbdullah AlorainiTATariq AlaneziAMAhmad Madkhali

Key Points

  • Both fenestrating and reconstituting laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy showed similar postoperative outcomes, despite slight variations in complications.
  • Among patients with Grade 2 cholecystitis, the reconstituting technique had a higher severity rate than the fenestrating approach (90% vs. 56.5%).
  • A total of 46 patients were analyzed, with neither technique having significant differences in operative difficulty or major complications.
  • Cholecystectomy techniques need further investigation due to descriptive nature and small sample size, suggesting possible variability in outcomes.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSTC), either fenestrating or reconstituting, offers potential benefits for the “difficult gallbladders” in terms of reduced bile duct injury (BDI) risk. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed data from patients who underwent reconstituting or fenestrating LSTC at a tertiary care center. We excluded patients who were converted to open cholecystectomy or had incomplete medical records. The data examined included demographic and clinical characteristics, preoperative assessments, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. No multivariable regression was performed because of the limited sample size. Results: The study included 46 patients (reconstituting: 20 patients; fenestrating: 26 patients). The severity of cholecystitis assessed by the Tokyo guidelines showed a higher proportion of Grade 2 severity in the reconstituting group than the fenestrating group (90% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.027). Both surgical techniques were similarly challenging and showed no significant differences in operative difficulty, operative duration, blood loss, or total hospital stay. Fenestrating procedures had non-significantly higher incidences of BDI (7.7% vs. 0%; p = 0.21), bile leakage (23.1% vs. 10%; p = 0.246), and intraoperative drain placement (88.5% vs. 75%; p = 0.232). Postoperative complications such as bile leaks were also comparable between the two techniques. Nevertheless, given the small sample, these observations are descriptive and should not be interpreted as evidence of comparability or superiority. Conclusions: Despite limitations, our analysis suggests that fenestrating and reconstituting approaches have comparable postoperative outcomes, although fenestrating procedures were associated with slight but non-significant increases in BDI and drain placement due to leaks. The choice of LSTC technique should depend on intraoperative findings, surgical expertise, and familiarity with each technique, but further studies are needed to obtain firm conclusions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aloraini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd89e6fe798ba2fc4981e7https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192465
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper