PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025Vaccines4 citationsOpen Access

Intertypic Recombination Between Coxsackievirus A16 and Enterovirus A71 Structural and Non-Structural Genes Modulates Virulence and Protection Efficacy

View Full Paper
HCHsin‐Hou ChangHTHan Kang TeeKOKien Chai Ong

Key Points

  • Chimeric viruses based on coxsackievirus A16 and enterovirus A71 demonstrated altered replication dynamics.
  • Only Chi-CCE and CVA16 showed high virulence in infected newborn mice, indicating critical genetic determinants.
  • Immunisation with inactivated Chi-CCE provided full protection against lethal CVA16 in a mouse model.
  • The study highlights the role of cytokine IL-10 in immune modulation during viral infection.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) and coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are major causative agents of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), often co-circulating and occasionally undergoing genetic recombination. While natural recombinants often involve genomic regions encoding non-structural proteins, their effects on replication and pathogenesis remain unclear. Methods: To address this, four chimera viruses (Chi-CCE, Chi-ECE, Chi-EEC, and Chi-CEC) were constructed with 5′UTR, capsid P1, and non-structural P2 and P3 genes, from CVA16 (denoted as C) or EV-A71 (denoted as E). These chimeras were tested for replication kinetics and cytopathic effects in rhabdomyosarcoma cells while in vivo virulence and protection efficacy were evaluated using a newborn BALB/c mouse model. Results: All chimeric viruses remained viable and exhibited higher replication than CVA16. In vivo, all chimeric viruses were avirulent except Chi-CCE and CVA16, which showed high virulence and viral titres in the brains and limbs of infected newborn mice. This suggests that 5′UTR and capsid P1 genes of CVA16 are critical genetic determinants of virulence. Notably, only the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was elevated, suggesting potential immune modulation during infection. Inactivated Chi-CCE immunisation conferred 100% protection against lethal CVA16 or mouse-adapted EV-A71 challenge revealing its potential as a bivalent vaccine candidate. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that recombination between CVA16 and EV-A71 influences viral virulence and protection efficacy with implications for future development of multivalent vaccines.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd89e6fe798ba2fc498241https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The molecular basis of mouse adaptation by human enterovirus 712008 · 133 citations
  2. 2A Non-Mouse-Adapted Enterovirus 71 (EV71) Strain Exhibits Neurotropism, Causing Neurological Manifestations in a Novel Mouse Model of EV71 Infection2011 · 152 citations
  3. 3Enterovirus 71 2C Protein Inhibits TNF-α–Mediated Activation of NF-κB by Suppressing IκB Kinase β Phosphorylation2011 · 90 citations
  4. 4The Association of Recombination Events in the Founding and Emergence of Subgenogroup Evolutionary Lineages of Human Enterovirus 712011 · 147 citations
  5. 5CVA16 infection causes neurological injury by engaging TLR2/MYD88/TNF-α/CXCL1 signalling pathway in hSCARB2 knock-in mice2025 · 4 citations