Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical, physics-based, and machine learning methods predict WBGT from numerical weather prediction data.
Abstract The wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is a linear combination of the natural wet bulb temperature (NWBT), the black globe temperature (BGT), and the dry bulb temperature (DBT). WBGT is used as a criterion for heat stress advisories by the United States Department of Defense and in the sports community. Strenuous outdoor activities under the two most severe (red and black) WBGT flag categories can potentially lead to heat exhaustion and heat stroke. However, given the complexity of the variables, NWBT and BGT are not directly available from numerical weather prediction (NWP) output. In this study, we diagnose the WBGT from NWP output at the Phillips Army Airfield managed by Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. Multiple diagnostic methods are used, including empirical formulas from the literature, a physics-based formulation, multiple linear regression (MLR), and machine learning methods such as extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and neural network (NN) models. For the red WBGT flag category, the top three methods with the highest critical success index (CSI) include a neural network model at 0.191 followed by MLR and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) with CSI at 0.150 and 0.147, respectively. Finally, for the black WBGT flag category, the top three methods with the highest CSI scores are MLR, NN model, and XGB with values of 0.349, 0.348, and 0.317, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: